On Friday 29 October 2004 01.57, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 18:08 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder > > > > wrote: > > > On Thursday 28 October 2004 16.40, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > Warning: The signature is bad. > > > > > > I guess this was unavoidable in a posting about a security related > > > issue with GnuPG... > > > > Verifies fine here. > > If you ignore the: > > gpg: WARNING: This key has been revoked by its owner! > gpg: This could mean that the signature is forgery. > gpg: reason for revocation: Key has been compromised > gpg: revocation comment: Compromised on the uid/gid remapping on alioth > > perhaps. Ah, now I see. I didn't really notice what key was used to sign the original message... greets -- vbi -- Oops
Attachment:
pgpUbcIBEZszD.pgp
Description: PGP signature