On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 16:57 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 18:08 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder > > wrote: > > > On Thursday 28 October 2004 16.40, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > Warning: The signature is bad. > > > > > > I guess this was unavoidable in a posting about a security related issue > > > with GnuPG... > > > > > Verifies fine here. > > If you ignore the: > > gpg: WARNING: This key has been revoked by its owner! > gpg: This could mean that the signature is forgery. > gpg: reason for revocation: Key has been compromised > gpg: revocation comment: Compromised on the uid/gid remapping on alioth > > perhaps. > Heh, had to refresh the key to get *that* :D I already had that key in my keyring unrevoked. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part