Re: Versioned bugs in the BTS (was: Drop testing)
* Frank Küster (firstname.lastname@example.org) [041028 17:00]:
> Matthias Urlichs <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Besides, we'll have a bug database which tracks version numbers. This in
> > turn means that we have a nice distinction between bugs that are actually
> > RC in the "fix this if we'd want to release Etch tomorrow" sense, and bugs
> > that are RC in the "keep this out of testing" sense.
> This sounds great, and I heard that it has been promised for after the
> sarge release, sounding as if it was implemented yet. Is the counterpart
> also implemented, namely testing scripts that take this information into
The implementation of version in the BTS is done so that the second is
not _so_ hard to implement (speaking as someone who has seen lots of
parts of britney).
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C