Re: RFD: Draft for a volatile.d.o policy
> v.d.o. should be supported by the Debian security team. I don't think it
> is worth doing if it can't be. One way to help make sure Debian security
> can support it is to keep it as small and simple as possible.
Martin Schulze writes:
> Backports.org isn't supported by the security team either and it's doing
> a very good job at responding to security problems and providing timely
But it isn't backports.debian.org and many people won't use it for that