Re: RFD: Draft for a volatile.d.o policy
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:48:00PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Sven Mueller writes:
> > Say a new open source network security scanner enters the world, and it
> > works well when compiled against Debian stable, we might want to add it
> > to v.d.o even though it wasn't available when the last stable
> > distribution was released. Or a new version of clamav is released, which
> > sadly breaks compatibility, so we rename it to clamav2 and it can still
> > be released through v.d.o, similarly to exim4 entering debian alongside
> > exim a while ago.
> Those things belong in the non-existent backports.debian.org, not in
The former yes, the later might go to v.d.o.
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
If a man cannot choose, he ceases to be a man.
--Minister (A clockwork orange)