Re: RFD: Draft for a volatile.d.o policy

[Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>]

John Hasler wrote:
> > This also might include working on a sort of security team for v.d.o (I
> > think both jobs should actually be combined in v.d.o).
> 
> v.d.o. should be supported by the Debian security team.  I don't think it
> is worth doing if it can't be.  One way to help make sure Debian security
> can support it is to keep it as small and simple as possible.

Backports.org isn't supported by the security team either and it's doing
a very good job at responding to security problems and providing timely
updates.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.