Re: RFD: Draft for a volatile.d.o policy
John Hasler wrote:
> > This also might include working on a sort of security team for v.d.o (I
> > think both jobs should actually be combined in v.d.o).
> v.d.o. should be supported by the Debian security team. I don't think it
> is worth doing if it can't be. One way to help make sure Debian security
> can support it is to keep it as small and simple as possible.
Backports.org isn't supported by the security team either and it's doing
a very good job at responding to security problems and providing timely
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.