also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.10.06.2023 +0200]: > How much network latency do you have? If -m10 is helping you, you > must be waiting on TCP/IP requests like crazy. I am not sure. A normal run via spamd takes about 3 seconds per message. At peak times, the server sees about 40 messages in that interval. > Fishy, fishy... find out why it is taking so much time to process > your messages that -m10 would help. Disable non-local checks for > a while, check your DNS cache (you have one on each of your MTA > and SA boxes, don't you?)... Yes, I run dnscache on all boxes. MTA and SA are on the same box. I only have one box with SA 3.0 so far. Considering that RBL checks are almost not cacheable by nature, I can fully understand. One pass through spamd causes maybe 20 DNS requests... I think 3 seconds to have them all answered is not bad. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature