[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

also sprach Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> [2004.10.06.1616 +0200]:
> This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
> order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from
> sarge if necessary.

That prevents SA from entering Sarge.

I say: remove all the others from Sarge unless or until they comply
with SA 3.

I fail to see yours and Adrian's rationale for why spamassassin
should collide with a software, when the software in fact collides
with spamassassin.

Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: