Re: The unofficial buildd effort and its shutdown - my POV
Ingo Juergensmann <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 02:49:24PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > For example, it is generally expected to have at least one package in
> > > the archive before even applying.
> > The overwhelming majority of people going through the NM process are
> > saying they want to maintain packages - this slants the typical case
> > that is seen very heavily towards that situation.
> Yes, but that doesn't count for me. And when I was reading the NM pages two
> weeks ago I stumbled again across that point and stopped reading: "Uhm,
> that's nothing for me then... I don't want to maintain a package, so I can't
> become a DD..."
Did you read http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step4, which
explicitly says the opposite?
Which page was it which says you must maintain a package to be a DD?