On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:34:52AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:29:43AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:52:17AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 06:55:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > >... Jose, please re-upload > > > > libgpg-error 0.7 with either an epoch or a "1.0-really-0.7" version > > > > as Goswin has suggested. Or, if you don't have time for this, please > > > > indicate which of these you prefer and I'll NMU according to your > > > > wishes. > > > > > How do you ensure that this doesn't cause breakages through wrong > > > dependencies if someone (a developer or an autobuilder) rebuilds e.g. > > > gpgme with the "real" libgpg-error 1.0 package installed? > > > > The chances of this happening are remote; AFAIK, the only packages that > > actually *use* libgpg-error are also affected by the base freeze. > > The package gpgme I mentioned as example in the mail your are quoting > isn't affected by the base freeze. But I maintain also gpgme, and I won't make any new upload unless I need for some RC bug. I'm sure this time :-) BTW; please don't CC me. I'm in both debian-devel and debian-release lists and haven't asked for being CCed. Thank you a lot :-) -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo jsogo@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature