On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:52:17AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 06:55:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >... Jose, please re-upload > > libgpg-error 0.7 with either an epoch or a "1.0-really-0.7" version > > as Goswin has suggested. Or, if you don't have time for this, please > > indicate which of these you prefer and I'll NMU according to your > > wishes. > How do you ensure that this doesn't cause breakages through wrong > dependencies if someone (a developer or an autobuilder) rebuilds e.g. > gpgme with the "real" libgpg-error 1.0 package installed? The chances of this happening are remote; AFAIK, the only packages that actually *use* libgpg-error are also affected by the base freeze. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature