Re: No libtiff transition for sarge
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 06:55:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>... Jose, please re-upload
>> libgpg-error 0.7 with either an epoch or a "1.0-really-0.7" version
>> as Goswin has suggested. Or, if you don't have time for this, please
>> indicate which of these you prefer and I'll NMU according to your
>> wishes.
>
> How do you ensure that this doesn't cause breakages through wrong
> dependencies if someone (a developer or an autobuilder) rebuilds e.g.
> gpgme with the "real" libgpg-error 1.0 package installed?
Not at all. This only works under the assumption that even if
something is build against the "real" libgpg-error 1.0 package it is
not using any of the new ABI features and is thus still compatible
with 0.7.
>> Steve Langasek
>
> cu
> Adrian
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: