Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:50:32AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> But the problem, which I'd like to point out still exists (despite it
> was not the case here, but still happend):
> - a new maintainer filed ITA, shortly after i was orphaned
> - builds a package and resolves bugs
> - wait for a Sponsor, because he/she is not a DD, filed RFS to
> - meanwhile QA Group fixes some trivial bugs and upload a new package
> -> new maintainer has to build a new package and his/her work was
> for nothing(, but learning ;-)), perhaps she/he is unhappy.
> IMO QA Group should respect an ITA and communicate with new maintainer
> about or at least wait always some weeks before touch it.
QA uploaders generally do respect ITAs, in my experience. Sometimes
Colin Watson [email@example.com]