Hi John! John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:09:16PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package. > > I'd like to veto here. > > They did no such thing. As the previous maintainer, I set the > maintainer to Debian QA, which is the *right and proper thing to do* > until the new person actually makes an opload. > And QA-Team did so. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/08/msg00048.html > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2004/08/msg00011.html > > > > A ready package, that solve this bug is already available. > > Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload? > > Did you even read the changelog at all? > > gif2png (2.4.7-2) unstable; urgency=low > > * Orphaning this package. > > -- John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:03:42 -0500 > > See, *I* orphaned it. That is the latest release. Nobody on the QA > team has done a thing with the package. > I think you missed the new QA-Upload of gif2png 2.4.7-3. Please see: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gif2png.html and: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gif2png/news/1.html "Changes: gif2png (2.4.7-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopting this package." > > What are next steps? > > Could QA-team revert their package and sponsor my one or have I build > > a new one? > > What QA package? > gif2png 2.4.7-3 Ok, I will build a new package these days and ask again for sponsoring. Regards, Erik -- www.ErikSchanze.de ********************************************* Bitte keine HTML-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Maillimit: 1 MB * * Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 30. Oktober 2004 * Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de *
Attachment:
pgpwj6y9wDWv3.pgp
Description: signature