Re: miscfiles NMU?
Thomas Bushnell BSG <email@example.com> writes:
> The nmu you (Wolfgang Sourdeau) just did of miscfiles was
> None of these were release critical.
He fixed a borken Build-Depends-Indep which is a severe policy
violation. So it was release critical. Build-Depends(-Indep), if
present, MUST be correct.
> You must attempt to contact the developer of a package, and NMU's are
> not appropriate without permission for anything less than a serious
Yes, bad boy. But hardly a reason for a second NMU to introduce back
all those bugs fixed in the first.
> Revert the NMU immediately.
Do you have any technical objection to any of the fixes for
Closes: 147321 150264 152791 167493 175700 190347 249867 249867 249871 249879 249882 249897 250068
(God, just look at the amount of bugs accumulated in the last 2 years
since your upload :)
or just bickering about social misbehaviour?