On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 01:17:56AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > > Supply *facts*, not hot air. You need volunteers? Then tell the public
> > > what kind of volunteers and for what tasks do you need some.
> > > Without this you're looking for slaves that do what you want them to do,
> > > not for volunteers.
> > Now, see, that's where you're wrong. We need volunteers. Volunteers
> > that decide for themselves what they do, that don't need to be told.
> > That find out where the problems lie, and go chase them. Fix them. That
> > believe in the idea we're all chasing. They don't need to be told those
> > things -- not by other volunteers, not by bosses, and certainly not by
> > job descriptions.
>
> Read the mail from Oliver Elphick.
Message-ID?
> > Yeah, we have a project leader, but he doesn't actually have to lead; if
> > he had, we wouldn't be as good as we are.
>
> Really, are we "good"?
Yes. When we finally release, our product is good; much better than most
other distributions.
> Do we get things done?
Yes, even if it takes a long time.
> Did we release on time?
We don't have deadlines; so, by definition, of course we did.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature