On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 03:57:17AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> On ven, 2004-07-16 at 21:53 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > > It's my understanding that you aren't willing to provide the code for
> > > buildd.net so that the same functionality can be incorporated into
> > > buildd.d.o. If that's the case then it's unfortunate but also shows
> > > that the problems are not just one-sided here.
> > Why? I'm donating a service, not the scripts. I think you should be able
> > to see the difference, although you seem to kindly ignore the fact that
> > buildd.d.o already said it won't include the scripts.
> Releasing the code for buildd.net is a necessary stepfor its inclusion
> on buildd.d.o. If you don't do that, overreaction from the buildd admins
> is expected.
buildd.d.o already declined my offer to include the scripts on buildd.d.o.
> We're making free software. Keeping your scripts just because you don't
> like those who could run them is a proprietary world's view.
Multibuild will be free software. You'll have to wait for it when you want
to see some sources.
--
Ciao... //
Ingo \X/