On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:08:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:25:36AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Regardless of who packages it - hell, Ali Akaagac could package it if it > > was of good enough quality - the question is who should maintain it for > > Debian. > > > > I would like to be part of this team, as I am an active upstream member, > > and I think I have reasonable Debian credentials (especially if I'm > > going to be packaging the things in the first place). > > > > Are you comfortable with an Uploaders: field for fd.o xlibs that > > includes myself? > > I'm not sure *my* comfort level is the first-order term in this equation. > > Quoting: > > [snip 'I don't like the XSF', from Daniel] Yes, I indicated my extreme discomfort with the current XSF order. The current XSF order, however, is not necessarily something which need be set in stone, no? -- Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org> Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature