[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Lost Trust



On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 09:16, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 09:05:18AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> 
> > * Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org> [040602 01:54]:
> > > Also, vendors in the USA may be required by law to not release the
> > > source in order to comply with FCC regulations.
> > 
> > Has anyone any source or quote for this? I searched for it and found
> > nothing, I've never seen any hint of a proof in any former discussion. 
> > Until someone comes up with any more substantial proof than
> > "they may" or "I've heared", I hereby claim this to be at least
> > an urban legend, most probably simply FUD.
> 
> madwifi

Thanks Matt, I use that driver, but I did not know about that:

Quote from the madwifi README:

...
The ath_hal module contains the Atheros Hardware Access Layer (HAL).
This code manages much of the chip-specific operation of the driver.
The HAL is provided in a binary-only form in order to comply with
local regulatory agency requirements.  In the United States the FCC
mandates a radio transmitter can only be operated at power levels
and on frequency channels for which it is approved.  The FCC requires
that a software-defined radio cannot be configured by a user to
operate outside the approved power levels and frequency channels.
This makes it difficult to open-source code that enforces limits
on the power levels, frequency channels and other parameters of the
radio transmitter.  See

http://ftp.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.pdf

for the specific FCC regulation.  Regulations for other agencies
are similar (often more stringent).  Because the module is provided
in a binary-only form it is marked "Proprietary"; this means when
you load it you will see messages that your system is now "tainted".
...

So it should be possible to put the code into non-us...

Greetings,
Oliver

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: