Re: coreutils with acl support
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 06:20:14AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2004 05:50, Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 06:35:59AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=debian-devel&m=105896394013190&w=2
> > >
> > > Following from the above discussion I notice that libattr1 and libacl1
> > > are libs/required, shouldn't they be base/required instead?
Not 100% sure, but I don't believe they should. Looking at a
few other base packages for example - e2fsprogs (base) relies
on libuuid1 (libs) amongst others; so I think its OK as is.