Re: coreutils with acl support
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 06:35:59AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Following from the above discussion I notice that libattr1 and libacl1 are
> libs/required, shouldn't they be base/required instead?
Nathan Scott <firstname.lastname@example.org> and Michael Stone <email@example.com>
would probably know the status of that project better than debian-devel.
mstone, at least, doesn't even read this list, according to the thread you