Re: coreutils with acl support
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 06:35:59AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=debian-devel&m=105896394013190&w=2
>
> Following from the above discussion I notice that libattr1 and libacl1 are
> libs/required, shouldn't they be base/required instead?
Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org> and Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
would probably know the status of that project better than debian-devel.
mstone, at least, doesn't even read this list, according to the thread you
referenced.
--
- mdz
Reply to: