Re: coreutils with acl support
On Wed, 19 May 2004 05:50, Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 06:35:59AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=debian-devel&m=105896394013190&w=2
> > Following from the above discussion I notice that libattr1 and libacl1
> > are libs/required, shouldn't they be base/required instead?
> Nathan Scott <email@example.com> and Michael Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> would probably know the status of that project better than debian-devel.
> mstone, at least, doesn't even read this list, according to the thread you
I CC'd Michael on my first message, I've CC'd Nathan on this one so I'm sure
that they both know about it.
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page