[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: coreutils with acl support

On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 06:35:59AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=debian-devel&m=105896394013190&w=2
> Following from the above discussion I notice that libattr1 and libacl1 are 
> libs/required, shouldn't they be base/required instead?

The base section has got less and less useful over the years, and now
carries precious little semantic content since the definition of base is
"whatever debootstrap installs". I think libs is a better fit.

Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to: