Re: When will amd64 be allowed in sid?
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 12:32:22AM +0100, email@example.com wrote:
> Hrm... Where'd you get linux-kernel-headers for amd64? It's not
> required by libc6-dev from biarch, but (more recent) libc6-dev in
> pure64 depends on it and neither pure64 on alioth nor the archive
> on bytekeeper.as28747.net/amd64/jgoerzen/amd64 appear to have that
> bugger. And it's obviously arch-dependent package (provides
> /usr/include/asm), so i386 archives are not useful.
I did build it myself but seems like I didn't upload it yet.
You'll need a small patch to build it, see #245387.
Maybe I should put the package on alioth too but I try to keep
the number of changed packages as small as possible.
> I've put together a pure64 chroot right now, but
> a) libc6-dev (and thus all other lib<...>-dev) is not installable
> b) dpkg-dev is not installable either, which turns building any
> packages on that puppy into a very interesting exercise, to put it mildly.
There is a dpkg-dev on alioth that should work.
Why isn't libc6-dev installable?
> After some digging around I've found (your, AFAICS) collection of packages
> including the missing stuff, but... Could you upload them on alioth?
> Would help to avoid a lot of PITA...
I am currently uploading alot of packages too alioth. Please let
me know which are missing there so I can upload them.
> Al, still not at the point when building the kernel on pure64 would be
> possible (biarch setup allows to do that fine).
I was able to compile a kernel on it ages ago but I don't think
you currently can build it with IA32 emulation.