Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> writes:
> Well, there is another explanation around as well, which at least a
> few of the people I talked to on IRC verified. Several of these
> people did not realize that the change was substantial, because there
> were no rationale or explanation included in the vote document, and
> the title of the vote claimed that the change was only editorial.
>
> So perhaps they cared, but were not aware of the issue?
In this case you should have voted "further discussion".
Of course, such behavior has a tendency to stifle progress. Given
that there was so little discussion leading up to the vote, I think it
was appropriate in this case.
--
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, netscape.net,
postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr.
Reply to: