* Manoj Srivastava (srivasta@debian.org) wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:35:02 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> said: > > [Jochen Voss] > >> By the way, what was the meaning of "editorial" in "Editorial > >> changes to the Social Contract GR"? > > > Normally, in a political vote, "editorial change" is used to get > > people to believe that a controversial change isn't, giving a > > minority a better chance to get their vote passed while no-one is > > looking. > > Looking at the vote results, there does not appear to be much > controversy going on. 482 DDs voted in the DPL election, only 214 DDs voted in this 'editorial' change. That, by itself, is something I would consider controversial. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature