[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0400, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> said: 

> * Manoj Srivastava (srivasta@debian.org) wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:35:02 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen
>> <pere@hungry.com> said:
>> > [Jochen Voss]
>> >> By the way, what was the meaning of "editorial" in "Editorial
>> >> changes to the Social Contract GR"?
>> > Normally, in a political vote, "editorial change" is used to get
>> > people to believe that a controversial change isn't, giving a
>> > minority a better chance to get their vote passed while no-one is
>> > looking.
>> Looking at the vote results, there does not appear to be much
>> controversy going on.

> 482 DDs voted in the DPL election, only 214 DDs voted in this
> 'editorial' change.  That, by itself, is something I would consider
> controversial.

	You consider apathy controversial? man, a MIA developer must
 send you off the rocker, then.

What is the sound of one hand clapping?
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: