Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Joshua Kwan <email@example.com> writes:
> This is a bad idea. I will say, however, that I did *not* vote on this GR:
> strapped for time, I read the original call for votes as something trivial
> -- just some janitorial work to the social contract that did not change
> anything meaningful. The proposal failed to include a summary of the
> changes or even something like a wdiff(1) of the two versions.
See, that's how they get you. You should have voted "Further
discussion". Not voting is _always_ the worst choice you can make, no
matter how unimportant the proposal looks.
: :' : Romain Francoise <firstname.lastname@example.org>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/