Re: Security Supporting Debian Kernels in Sarge
Graham Wilson wrote:
> > That's not entirely unreasonable. Why should the m68k folks expect
> > the security team to maintan 2.2 when they are not willing to put in
> > the effort needd to make 2.6 run on their arch?
> Why not get a designated person from the m68k port to compile and test
> new kernel security updates. Is there some reason this is not possible
> or a good idea? Or is this already done?
Guess what, this person does even exist already...
The only stupid question is the unasked one.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.