On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 09:39:59AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * John Goerzen (jgoerzen@complete.org) [040423 23:10]: > > That's not entirely unreasonable. Why should the m68k folks expect the > > security team to maintan 2.2 when they are not willing to put in the > > effort needd to make 2.6 run on their arch? > > Actually, they are putting effort in 2.6 to make it run on whole m68k. > While it runs on some subarchs, for others some more work is needed - > but work just needs time sometimes. Maybe sarge could release with the subarches of 2.6 that work, thereby dropping 2.2 sources, and later point releases could have support for other subarches, assuming the support has been added to 2.6 and d-i. -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature