On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 04:37:32PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I see only one way to deal with that: drop security support for m68k. :-P That's not entirely unreasonable. Why should the m68k folks expect the security team to maintan 2.2 when they are not willing to put in the effort needd to make 2.6 run on their arch?