On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:43:49AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > i believe someone said they were working on this, and then herbert said at a > later point that he would no longer accept patches unless they came from > upstream. perhaps i'm mistaken or this has changed? The patches should be passed via upstream, or at least tested: we don't want to distribute buggy drivers, either. > - a non-free driver disk with said firmware Software that violates the GPL isn't distributable; it can't even go in non-free. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Protect Open Source in Australia from over-reaching changes to IP law http://www.petitiononline.com/auftaip/ & http://www.linux.org.au/fta/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature