On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 08:19:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 12:59:29PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 06:40:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Am I the only one under the impression that the "sid" tag is completely > > > useless? > > > Unless the testing scripts start to add to all bugs in a packages > > > tagged "sid" also a tag "sarge" when a version of this package enters > > > testing I don't see much value in the "sid" tag. > > Most bugs I've seen tagged "sid" are RC bugs, which means they're > > usually fixed before the package propagates to sarge. > >... > Currently, there are 1293 open bugs tagged sid but not tagged sarge. > They include 72 RC bugs, which are 5,57% of all such bugs. ... which I guess goes to show how innocuous the misuses of the sid tag are, if so many probable mis-tags haven't interfered significantly with the legitimate uses of the tag. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature