Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:42:42 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040329204242.GA31438@scowler.net>
Mail-followup-to: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040329202338.GB4995@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 20040325071939.GA29926@marvin.sbg.palfrader.org> <[🔎] 20040325101845.GS16746@fs.tum.de> <[🔎] 20040328152452.GA12359@marvin.sbg.palfrader.org> <[🔎] 20040328154638.GE25294@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20040328204554.GA15113@seventeen> <[🔎] 20040329202338.GB4995@deadbeast.net>

> It has been said that the Policy Manual is supposed to document existing
> practice...

There's no need for you to encourage them.

Reply to:

References:
- rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
  - From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
  - From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
  - From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
Next by Date: [OT] Re: testing and no release schedule
Previous by thread: Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
Next by thread: Bug#238833: konqueror: Fails to render ∀ ∈ &and;
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread