On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 15:00, Number Six wrote: > Since I've identified myself as the author of tupim, I'm not any worse > off getting a new package in than anybody else. And since it's not > going to be called 'pim', what's the problem? If nobody will accept > friendlynames (which, btw, I'm already almost finished with), then I'll > just build my thing without it, put it on sourceforge, and point people > to it. I don't care if nobody uses it but me. Which I've heard a time > or two about Debian. Have you heard about bash's tab completion?: kurth@nimrod:~$ pi<tab> pi-csd pi-nredir pic pickdns-data pidof pilot-datebook pilot-prc pinfo pi-getram pi1toppm pic2graph pico pilot-addresses pilot-dedupe pilot-schlep ping pi-getrom pi3topbm pickdns picocom pilot-archive pilot-file pilot-undelete pinky pi-getromtoken pia pickdns-conf piconv pilot-clip pilot-foto pilot-xfer kurth@nimrod:~$ kurth@nimrod:~$ tu<tab> (nothing...) Okay, I have all this pilot stuff, but even without them, (I also tried this on another host) you are still better off with tupim than with pim, if you just want to save keystrokes. Which you already wasted in this thread. Greetings, Oliver
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part