Re: Proposal: /etc/friendlynames
Number Siz writes:
>On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:41:53PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 05:37:39AM -0800, Number Six wrote:
>> > Aw, yer just a big meaniehead poopin on my good idea.
>>
>> I hope you have fun getting packages through the NEW queue.
>
>You said that putting /etc/alternatives/pim and expecting
>other people who provide /usr/bin/pim to do the same and conflicting
>with people who don't was reasonable. Are you changing your mind?
>
>Or are you complaining about me not using my real name?
>
>Or are you just making a joke about having a thick skin?
>
>Since I've identified myself as the author of tupim, I'm not any worse
>off getting a new package in than anybody else. And since it's not
>going to be called 'pim', what's the problem? If nobody will accept
>friendlynames (which, btw, I'm already almost finished with), then I'll
>just build my thing without it, put it on sourceforge, and point people
>to it. I don't care if nobody uses it but me. Which I've heard a time
>or two about Debian.
Enough crap from this moron. *plonk*
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
Reply to: