Re: m68k arch falling ever behind
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> If an arch cannot keep up, important packages still get built, less
> important ones are stalled. I admit this can be frustrating if you're
> maintaining an out-of-date package in extra/math, down at the very
> bottom of the queue, but on the whole I think it's a reasonable scheme.
Erm, not really well working for todays problems anymore. There are better
distributing schemes than that one w-b uses.
--
Ciao... //
Ingo \X/
Reply to: