Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> schrieb:
> >
> >> I see there's some new gnustep packages with overly-generic names.
> >>
> >> Is there a reason why these aren't all prefixed with `gnustep-' or `gs-'
> >> or something?
> >
> > Err, no - please don't use gs. That's ghostscript.
>
> Well, gs is ghostscript. But the proposal is to use gs as prefix, not
> as name.
Like in:
gs-common
gs-esp
gs-cjk-resource
Thiemo
Reply to: