more overly-generic package names from gnustep
I see there's some new gnustep packages with overly-generic names.
Is there a reason why these aren't all prefixed with `gnustep-' or `gs-'
Can someone remind me of the result of the last time this was argued
[A quick list of offending (IMHO) packages:
Suburbia: where they tear out the trees and then name streets after them.