[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep

On 23-Mar-04, 07:39 (CST), Mathieu Roy <yeupou@coleumes.org> wrote: 
> Frank K?ster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
> > Err, no - please don't use gs. That's ghostscript.
> Well, gs is ghostscript. But the proposal is to use gs as prefix, not
> as name.

His point, with which I agree, is that many people would associate
gs-whatever with ghostscript, not gnustep. Using gstep- is less likely
to be confusing.


Steve Greenland
    The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
    system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
    world.       -- seen on the net

Reply to: