On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:24:47AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > However, the first simple protection would be to have the xxx-action@ > > aliases do some kind of (pseudo) header checking. to reduce the number of manual > > interverntions. > > As you can already put "close xxx", what's the reason to have the > xxx-action@ aliases? They don't do the same thing. -- - mdz