Re: Seeking comments on PAM logging change
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Oliver" == Oliver Kurth <email@example.com> writes:
Oliver> Although I agree with you on the problem, I think this
Oliver> should be really handled by upstream, otherwise you make
Oliver> it incompatible.
As far as I'm concerned, Debian PAM is basically forked from the
upstream already. Upstream does not act on patches in a reasonable
time line; upstream does not respond to mail questions; upstream
releases versions of PAM that cannot work with applications like cron
I do try to make sure that I have a number of patches open against
upstream PAM on the off chance they ever get reviewed. I will try and
resync with PAM releases from time to time; I chose not to care about
0.77 but will hopefully care about the next PAM release.
If you think this sucks, you're right. If you think you can do a
better job of getting upstream to listen than I, be my guest.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----