On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:45, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 08:35:24PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:31, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > > > Nor > > > does it have accessible multi-valued returns - you have to define an > > > entire class to do it. > > > > huh? pair(x,y); And similar things can be done for larger collections. > > Try it, compared to a list return in perl or similar languages. That sounds like a use for overloaded operator , & a list<> return type. Yes - perl does it intrinsically, and probably cleaner. But it's not true to say that C requires one to define a custom class for doing it, as the generic handle it quite nicely. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part