Re: obvious packages missing from debian?
Edward S Peschko <email@example.com> writes:
> well, it might be, but it has its own separate project -
> as well as it should be.
Yes, it's useful to have a separate libiconv distribution for platforms
other than GNU/Linux. However, if you already have glibc, why would you
want a separate libiconv package?
> libiconv on the other hand, is used by quite a few gnu projects..
I don't understand what problem you're trying to solve. Any package that
needs iconv would compile fine on a Debian GNU/Linux system since it would
find the necessary functions in libc already.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>