On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:55:43AM +0000, Will Newton wrote: > On Thursday 12 Feb 2004 10:18 pm, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > What, silence in face of hostility? I am not sure I blame him. > I think the word that is mentioned most is transparency. A bit more of that > and we would be OK. More likely it wouldn't make any difference beyond giving the people who are already inclined to be upset more excuses. > Even if it was a simple "F*ck off, we don't want your > steenking buildd" we'd know where we stood, Are you seriously suggesting that that comment wouldn't be flamed for arrogantly dismissing offers of help and declared as being completely unacceptable? I trust if such claims are ever made, you'll be criticising the complainers for working to suppress transparency. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature