[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:55:43AM +0000, Will Newton wrote:
> On Thursday 12 Feb 2004 10:18 pm, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > 	What, silence in face of hostility? I am not sure I blame him.
> I think the word that is mentioned most is transparency. A bit more of that 
> and we would be OK. 

More likely it wouldn't make any difference beyond giving the people who are
already inclined to be upset more excuses.

> Even if it was a simple "F*ck off, we don't want your 
> steenking buildd" we'd know where we stood, 

Are you seriously suggesting that that comment wouldn't be flamed for
arrogantly dismissing offers of help and declared as being completely
unacceptable? I trust if such claims are ever made, you'll be criticising
the complainers for working to suppress transparency.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

             Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
           http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: