On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:55:43AM +0000, Will Newton wrote:
> On Thursday 12 Feb 2004 10:18 pm, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > What, silence in face of hostility? I am not sure I blame him.
> I think the word that is mentioned most is transparency. A bit more of that
> and we would be OK.
More likely it wouldn't make any difference beyond giving the people who are
already inclined to be upset more excuses.
> Even if it was a simple "F*ck off, we don't want your
> steenking buildd" we'd know where we stood,
Are you seriously suggesting that that comment wouldn't be flamed for
arrogantly dismissing offers of help and declared as being completely
unacceptable? I trust if such claims are ever made, you'll be criticising
the complainers for working to suppress transparency.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature