Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

To: Steven Leach <stevenaleach@mac.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:01:23 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040204060123.GA2028@complete.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] BE7F1740-56D5-11D8-97F6-000393A2E26E@mac.com>
References: <[🔎] 200402041630.13522.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] BE7F1740-56D5-11D8-97F6-000393A2E26E@mac.com>

On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:48:23AM -0500, Steven Leach wrote:
> Number one on my 'not in Debian/Linux but should be' list is OS X style 
> (Or is it really NextStep style) application bundles.

What does that gain us?  I am constantly chagrined that there is no way
to completely uninstall software on OS X.  Even Windows 95 had that.
(OK, it's not perfect, but it's there.)

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Steven Leach <stevenaleach@mac.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by Date: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Previous by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread