[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

Number one on my 'not in Debian/Linux but should be' list is OS X style (Or is it really NextStep style) application bundles.

On Wednesday, February 4, 2004, at 12:30 AM, Russell Coker wrote:

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:43, smurfd <smurfd@smurfnet.homelinux.net> wrote:
Something similar to the Harden packages, but say, a "harden-kernel"
package, wich will, install a kernel-source, and you get to choose from
the available securityrelated kernel patches..
* grsecurity or
* adamantix or
* etc etc..

Of course each of GRSec, Adamantix, and SE Linux requires a different set of user-space tools for configuration and administration. They offer different
features and do things in different ways.

Having a choice between exec-shield and pax would make more sense.  But
there's the issue of patch conflicts...

http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: