Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Number one on my 'not in Debian/Linux but should be' list is OS X style
(Or is it really NextStep style) application bundles.
On Wednesday, February 4, 2004, at 12:30 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:43, smurfd <email@example.com> wrote:
Something similar to the Harden packages, but say, a "harden-kernel"
package, wich will, install a kernel-source, and you get to choose
the available securityrelated kernel patches..
* grsecurity or
* adamantix or
* etc etc..
Of course each of GRSec, Adamantix, and SE Linux requires a different
user-space tools for configuration and administration. They offer
features and do things in different ways.
Having a choice between exec-shield and pax would make more sense. But
there's the issue of patch conflicts...
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact