Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:12:58PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [(e)links dependencies are too big]
> > That's not true either. As the former maintainer of a package that did
> > have such a list[1], I know it when I see it :-)
> [...]
>
> You have duplicated my error in
> <[🔎] E1AjaKW-0001RS-DB@mid.downhill.at.eu.org>, looking at the links
> instead of at the elinks package, elinks dependencies currently
> include xlibs.
No, he also said:
> > (xlibs can be eliminated.)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: