Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ?
>>>>> "David" == David Nusinow <email@example.com> writes:
David> Because, as I said, this discussion is worthless without
David> the input of the people who are actually involved in the
Even without the input of these people you could still write up a
summary of the proposed alternatives and the pros/cons of each one.
This could be of assistance when somebody asks "why don't we do it
this why?" You can just point to the summary.
Similarly, if/when the people involved get time you can point them to
I think it would be considerable quicker looking at a summary rather
then an reading a long thread on this mailing list.
The only problem might be keeping the summary unbiased...
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>