[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ?

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:11:45 -0500, David Nusinow <dnusinow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

I think that this discussion should wait until after the release of
sarge. Most particularly, I'd like to see it started by aj and his
appointed helpers. They're the ones who are seeing the release process
most clearly, and as such I think that their insights will be critical
to any discussion of changing the release process in any serious way. If
we could have a sarge post-mortem discussion, initiated by those who
actually have something to say that's backed up by real experience, I
think it'd be very helpful. But until sarge is actually released, I
think focusing on getting it out the door is far more important.

 - David Nusinow

I don't see why we should not plan for something like this now. I also don't see how this discussion will distract from the release of sarge, or why waiting until sarge is done is approiate. A lot of issues with the current release structure can be seen now, sure maybe more will come up but what's the point of waiting? I sense a long an pointless thread comming...

Matthew A. Nicholson

Reply to: